Tuesday, October 14, 2014

A World That Might Have Been

In everyone's lifetime, there is an event so different, so dramatic, so unlike every day life, that it causes people to say: "I remember exactly what I was doing when..." For my grandparents, it was Pearl Harbor. For my mother, it was JFK's assassination. For my generation, it was 9/11. I was working from home, and got a call to turn on the TV, just before the second plane hit the WTC. 9/11 and America's subsequent rush to war marks a pivotal change in the world, a before and after event standing between two different worlds.

So whenever I discover facts about that event, that time, and what happened after, that cause me to question what happened, why it happened, they cause me to question my entire frame of reference for the world.

The first WTC attack, the Al Qaeda attacks on US African embassies, the USS Cole bombing, the second WTC attack. They were described as a war by terrorists that required not one but two wars against enemies. We were told that war was necessary, that we could no longer rely on pre-9/11 thinking, we could no longer rely on judicial proceedings, that only war would work.

After 9/11, how many Americans wanted justice? How many wanted vengeance? Regardless of whether it was 1% or 100%, the administration wanted it, and they were determined to have it. However, just before 9/11, four Al Qaeda operatives were given life sentences for the 1998 suicide bombings of the American embassies in East Africa. What would our world be like today if the Bush Administration had sought a judicial, instead of a war, resolution in 9/11? The FBI's New York Office and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of N.Y. already had an indictment for Osama bin Laden at the time of 9/11.

Would the Iraq invasion have occurred? How much better would America's reputation be if the entire WMD controversy never had occurred? How much better off would the government bottom line if some of the $4 trillion that was spent in the post-9/11 global war not been fought? The 2008 financial crisis has been blamed on everything from loose lending standards for mortgages to the poor to lax regulatory standards on big banks. One reason for the 2008 financial crisis that most accept is the creation of too much debt. How much of that was due to the debt created by an un-funded war on terror?

James Risen's new book Pay Any Price Greed Power and Endless War has a number of vignettes illustrating how unbelievable amounts of money were spent in the war on terror. It is tempting to state that unbelievable amounts of money were destroyed, thrown away, wasted. But, of course, they weren't. The money went somewhere. The money went to people "on the in". People with pull, people with a connection. The sad thing is that these people, by and large, don't need more. And they money came from people that couldn't afford it.

President Eisenhower, that last president with the guts to say "Enough is enough", also said the following:

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road. The world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

Where were you when the first documented case of Ebola transmission in America was announced? Perhaps wondering if some of those $4 trillion spent on a war on terror might have been better spent on research? On hospitals? On health worker education? Maybe its time we declare the end to the war on terror, before it eats us alive.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

HEB Helps Again

I am always looking out for ways that HEB is trying to help me save money. HEB is the local grocery chain in Texas that is working to save Texans money. My first real job, way back in 1974, was working as a bag boy in HEB store number 2 in Alamo Heights. I sacked groceries (back when we used paper sacks) and carried them out to the cars for customers. I worked my way up to late night stocker. We would come in at 8 or 9 pm, break down the pallets of groceries, attach a price sticker (that was a long time ago, before barcodes and scanners) to each box or can, and distribute the groceries to the shelves. We would finish up before 4 am, and then head to Mie Tierra for dinner/breakfast. I would then head for school; I was a senior in high school, and I am convinced that that experience was what helped me get my Undergraduate Degree. Taught me what I didn't want to do for the rest of my life. But I digress.

Fast forward to today. I am currently located in Austin, but I do my banking with United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Federal Savings Bank in San Antonio. I don't have a local, Austin Bank. I have a small box full of loose change that I wanted to recover. HEB happens to have a Coinstar machine that is advertised to help. I know that some of the Security Service Credit Unions have change machines in their locations, but I don't have an account with SSCU. So I took my box of change to my local HEB for "help".

It turns out the Coinstar machine at HEB has three options:

  1. Cash Voucher - With a fee of ONLY 10.9 cents per dollar of change tendered,
  2. Gift Card - You can exchange your change for a gift card, useable at such locations as Applebee's, Home Depot, etc. but NOT HEB,
  3. Donate your change to charity

So, HEB will "help" you exchange your loose change. But if you want to buy groceries with your loose change, it will cost you 10.9%. Thanks for the help, HEB.

Sunday, October 5, 2014

Norway and the 2022 Winter Olympics

Norway will NOT host the 2022 Winter Olympics. Instead, that "honor" will fall to either Kazakhstan or China. And after reading some details of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) requirements, I say that the IOC will be lucky to find any country that will have them. It really is a case of the 1% being out of touch with reality. And it is a shame. Norway has more winter olympic medals than any other country, and Norway hosted the 1952 games in Oslo and 1994 game in Lillehammer. Perhaps the cost of the Sochi game ($51 billion) was a bit too much. But more likely, it was simply the IOC demands, which were detailed in a Norwegian newspaper article.

The requirements were more than 7000 pages long. That perhaps is understandable in light of modern day security needs. But here were some specific requirements:

  1. Prior to the opening ceremony, the IOC delegates will be provided with a cocktail party with the King and Royal Family, to be paid for by the Royal Family and/or the Norwegian Olympic Committee (NOC). The type and brand of alcohol was specified.
  2. Full control over all advertising spaces throughout the city of Oslo must be provided to the IOC, to be used exclusively for IOC sponsored items only.
  3. The NOC to provide and pay for Samsung Cell Phones and cellular service.
  4. The NOC and/or City of Oslo to provide cars and drivers for all IOC delegates and members.
  5. IOC members in their cars to be provided right-of-way, including a dedicated center lane, throughout the City of Oslo. Schools to be closed and Oslo Citizens to be encouraged to take vacation and leave the city throughout the duration of the Olympic games. Public transportation to be halted throughout the games.
  6. IOC members to be given dedicated walkways throughout the City, and Oslo Citizens to be restricted from walkways for IOC members.
  7. Separate, dedicated facilities for arrival and departure of IOC members at the Oslo airport.
  8. Traffic rules and traffic lights to be prioritized for IOC members.
  9. Specific seasonal fruits and cakes to be available on arrival in the IOC member's hotel rooms.
  10. Hot breakfast buffet with new dishes daily for IOC members. Additional breakfast staff to serve IOC "bosses only" queue.
  11. 24-hour room service, butler service and laundry for IOC members.
  12. Hotels must have shops and must not display any items that compete with IOC sponsors.
  13. Hotels must provide IOC meeting rooms that provide instant access to all-inclusive banquet service.
  14. Meeting rooms to be kept at 20C (68F).
  15. At Olympic Stadium, IOC members must be provided with access to sufficient food and drink of "high-quality". Light snacks and canapes are not of sufficient quality. Provision of hot foods must be replaced regularly.
  16. During the opening and closing ceremony, a full bar must be provided. Beer and wine are sufficient on competition days.

I was trying to imagine what the reaction would be to the IOC handing over 7000 pages of demands requirements to an American city, say, Salt Lake City, and what the response of the American Olympic Committee chairman, say Mitt Romney, would be. Would it be: "You are out of your mind"? Or would it be: "Hey, we can all make money together out of this"?

Now, which country is more likely to come up with $50+ billion, Kazakhstan, or China? Dedicated traffic lanes? Didn't they try that in the U.S.S.R.?